"Nanny", "tyrant"—these were among the charges hurled at
Michael Bloomberg, New York’s mayor, when he proposed a ban on big fizzy-drink
bottles last May. The billionaire shrugged and pushed forward. However even Mr.
Bloomberg must heed a court order. The American Beverage Association, which
represents Coca-Cola and other soda companies, has sued. Mr. Bloomberg’s ban is
due to start on March 12th, but a judge may intervene. Three
years after Michelle Obama launched her Let’s Move! campaign, the fight against
childhood obesity faces a tactical problem. Recent years have been dipping
obesity rates in a few places, including New York, Mississippi and Philadelphia.
But 17% of American children are still obese. The question is how to speed up
progress. Further bans look increasingly unlikely. Voluntary
programs remain politically much easier. Mrs. Obama has exhorted firms to take
action. Many companies have. On March 6th the Partnership for a Healthier
America, a business group, published a report praising its members for putting
more grocers in poor areas and healthier foods at restaurants. Sixteen food and
beverage companies have promised to slash a combined 1.5 trillion calories from
their products by 2015. Their first progress report is due in June. The
long-term effect of these efforts may be slim. For example, even if the food and
drink firms keep their promise, they would cut just 14 calories from the average
American’s daily diet. Regulations might bring bigger change,
but recent years suggest that such rules will come slowly, if at all. Congress
did pass a law requiring healthier school lunches, though its effects are
limited. Other attempts at national regulation have stalled. Four federal
agencies studied voluntary guidelines to limit junk-food advertisements to
children. Under pressure from Congress, the agencies dropped the effort.
Obamacare requires that all restaurants and cinemas post the number of calories
in their foods. The Food and Drug Administration proposed a rule for menus in
2011, but has yet to finalise the regulation. Cities and states
are more likely to act than Congress (hardly a high bar), but they face their
own challenges. Last year the beverage lobby spent more than $2.8m to defeat a
soda tax in the small city of Richmond, California. Even Mr. Bloomberg, the
anti-obesity crusade’s most fervent warrior, can only do so much. We can infer from the last paragraph that ______.
A.in the city of Richmond there is no soda tax
B.cities and states are less likely to take action
C.cities and states face less challenges than Congress
D.Mr. Bloomberg helps to cancel soda tax in Richmond