Flats were almost unknown in Britain until the 1850s when
they were developed, along with other industrial dwellings, for the laboring
classes. These vast blocks were plainly a convenient means of easing social
conscience by housing large numbers of the ever-present poor on compact city
sites. During the 1880s, however, the idea of living in comfortable residential
chambers caught on with the affluent upper and upper-middle classes, and
controversy as to the advantages and disadvantages of flat life was a topic of
conversation around many a respectable dinner-table. In Paris and other major
European cities, the custom whereby the better-off lived in apartments, or
fiats, was well established. Up to the late nineteenth century in England only
bachelor barristers had established the tradition of living in rooms near the
Law Court: any self-respecting head of household would insist upon a West End
town house as his London home, the best that his means could provide.
The popularity of flats for the better-off seems to have developed for a
number of reasons. One is the introduction of the railways, which had enabled a
wide range of people to enjoy a holiday staying in a suite at one of the luxury
hotels which had begun to spring up during the previous decade. Hence, there is
no doubt that many of the early luxury fiats were similar to hotel suites, even
being provided with communal dining-rooms and central boilers for hot water and
heating. Rents tended to be high to cover overheads, but savings were made
possible by these communal amenities and by tenants being able to reduce the
number of family servants. One of the earliest substantial
London developments of flats for the well-to-do was begun soon after Victoria
Railway Station was opened in 1860, as the train service provided an efficient
link with both the City and the South of England. Victoria Street, adjacent to
both the Station and Westminster, had already been formed, and under the
direction of the architect, Henry Ashton, was being lined, with blocks of
residential chambers in the Parisian manner. These fiats were commodious indeed,
offering between eight and fifteen rooms apiece, including appropriate domestic
offices. The idea was an emphatic departure from the tradition of the London
house and achieved immediate Success. Perhaps the most notable
block in the vicinity was Queen Anne’s Mansions, partly designed by E.R. Robson
in 1884 and recently demolished. For many years, this was London’s loftiest
building and had strong claims to be the ugliest. The block modeled on the
American skyscraper, and was nearly 200 feet high. The cliff-like walls of dingy
brick completely overshadowed the modest thoroughfare nearby. Although bleak
outside, the mansion fiats were palatial within, with sumptuously furnished
communal entertaining and dining rooms, and lifts to the uppermost floors. The
success of these tall blocks of flats could not have been achieved, of course,
without the invention of the lift, or ’ascending carriage’ as it was called when
first used in the Strand Law Courts in the 1870s. One effect of the railways’ coming to central London was to stimulate
the building of
A. large and well-appointed hotels.
B. blocks of self-contained fiats.
C. rows of elegant town houses.
D. fiats similar to hotel suites.