A new book by a former lawyer at Kirkland &
Ellis, one of the nation’s largest law firms, has delivered a thrill to the
already rattled legal profession. In The Lawyer Bubble: A Profession in Crisis,
Steven J. Harper argues that legal jobs are disappearing not because of
short-term economic fluctuations but because of powerful long-term trends. The
word bubble is an overstatement, but Harper deserves credit for sounding the
alarm. The decline in the market for lawyers is being driven by
an array of forces. For some time now, corporate clients have been less willing
to sign off on bulky legal bills. They have increasingly been balking at the top
hourly rates of $1,000 that some partners charge. And as a result of
globalization, an increasing share of American legal work is being shipped
overseas. Lawyers in India and other lower- wage markets are willing to do the
work for a fraction of what American law firms would charge. Taking away even
more of this work: newly sophisticated legal software that can do "document
review" and other tasks for which lawyers were once needed. The
legal market is without question soft these days. Last June, the Association for
Legal Career Professionals released a grim placement report stating that only
65.4% of law-school graduates had found jobs for which it was necessary to pass
a state bar exam. And the Internet is full of first-hand accounts of law-school
graduates who say that their law degree has not helped them get a law job-and,
worse still, those who report that their degree has actually hurt their job
prospects, since some employers now tell them they are overqualified for
nonlegal positions. Harper argues that the profession’s leaders
are a big part of the problem. He contends that big-firm managers are too
focused on maximizing profits for the biggest, most rainmaking partners-at the
expense of junior lawyers and the long-term interest of the firm. And he faults
law-school deans for putting the interests and salaries of law professors ahead
of the interests of their underemployed, debt- laden students.
Controversial as it is, Harper’s big-picture argument is undoubtedly correct,
and it is a real cause for concern. Bar associations and legal academics have
begun talking about how the profession should adapt -discussions that are long
overdue. The biggest problem with The Lawyer Bubble is not the warning it is
sounding but its title; unlike tulips and other speculative bubbles in the past,
lawyers will always be a necessity not a fad. But then, The Very, Very
Challenging Job Market for Lawyers doesn’t have the same ring to it. The book The Lawyer Bubble: A Profession in Crisis ______.
A. has rattled legal profession.
B. is an exaggeration of the situation.
C. has caused deeper concern.
D. is a big blow to legal profession.